Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
gramparsons

1zzfe Longevity

Recommended Posts

What are we to expect out of this engine in terms of longevity?

 

A friend-of-a-friend is an Toyota mechanic, and I asked his opinion. He gave a guarded response, probably because I own one.

 

I know this is unscientific, but I thought I'd plant this as a seed to see what you guys thought.

 

His comments:

- not one of Toyo's best

- 150k w/o any problems should be easy (gee, I would expect the same out of a Dodge Neon)--again, totally subjective.

- If you ever start having engine trouble, get ride of it--he suggested that problems with this engine "snowball" into other issues.

 

I personally bought this car because of the following reaons

 

1) Toyota repuation for quality and durability

2) mileage

3) one of the lowest per-mile ownership costs (I commute 2 hours per day)

 

I've made no secret that I pretty much dislike the aesthetics of the car, much preferring the current (not new) Jetta TDI, but stayed away from it because of poor quality and ownership costs.

 

If this thing winks out at 150k, I'll be hard pressed to buy another Toyota.

 

I've got 55k on my '04 already, with no problems. I'd like to see 250, or even 300k, before she gives up. I have mostly highway miles, use Mobil 1, change at every 5000k, and even let the dealer rape me once every 30,000 miles.

 

What's a reasonable expectation?

Edited by gramparsons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trap

I think a "reasonable expectation" would be close to 250K. When you consider the fact that you use synth lube and most of its miles are highway, I'd believe it would go that far, depending on your driving habits.

 

By the time it reaches 250K you'd probably be ready to cast it off and replace it anyway. You'd probably have to replace a water pump, alternator or other part during that period but I'd believe the engine and tranny would hold up, provided routine maintenance was kept up.

 

I read on Toyota's Planet Kaisen website about QC processes regarding their engines. One is selected at random from a completed lot and subjected to wide-open throttle running for 180 hours, so components like crankshaft, bearings, piston rods, etc. can be tested for strength and durability. Essentially, this test is the equivalent of driving your car at maximum speed for 7.5 days nonstop.

 

Check it out. http://www.toyota.com/html/planetkaizen/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think a "reasonable expectation" would be close to 250K. When you consider the fact that you use synth lube and most of its miles are highway, I'd believe it would go that far, depending on your driving habits.

 

By the time it reaches 250K you'd probably be ready to cast it off and replace it anyway. You'd probably have to replace a water pump, alternator or other part during that period but I'd believe the engine and tranny would hold up, provided routine maintenance was kept up.

 

I read on Toyota's Planet Kaisen website about QC processes regarding their engines. One is selected at random from a completed lot and subjected to wide-open throttle running for 180 hours, so components like crankshaft, bearings, piston rods, etc. can be tested for strength and durability. Essentially, this test is the equivalent of driving your car at maximum speed for 7.5 days nonstop.

 

Check it out. http://www.toyota.com/html/planetkaizen/

Yes, definitely, I'll be tired of it by 250k, but hopefully I'll have a play car that I love well before then.

 

Maybe:

http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/18/Autos/ford...gt500/index.htm

 

Whoa momma! Now that's a car I could rub on over the weekend? (Wax, you pervs)

 

Just drive the rolla until it catches on fire, and leave the burned out hull on the side of the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's pretty sweet.

 

My take - in light of the rise in fuel costs I'd be more inclined to look towards a vintage two-seater ragtop, or even a non-vintage like that new Honda S2000 or Miata for a plaything.

 

Raw, tire-burning horsepower will always remain a testosterone-inducing thrill for many, and its rennaissance of late has appealed to both young and old.

 

I guess from my vantage point I couldn't envision owning the new Shelby or Mustang because neither one would fit inside my garage. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Toyota-san

Its kinda like "how long is a piece of string"?

 

Depends.

 

I've had vehicles that the press, CR, R&T, C&D have dumped on almost unmercilessly yet proved to be sturdy, reliable, and fun to drive. An example would be the K-cars from Mopar.

 

Conversely, I've had vehicles that got glowing reviews but turned out to be duds. The only car that was "average" (in terms of press reviews and durability as well as my own experience, was a 95 Ford Taurus.) Other than the maddeninly lazy shifting transmission, this car was pretty reliable.

 

I guess durability, to an extent, is based on a definition that all must agree upon. For instance, is a Mazda or Honda that requires a timing belt replacement every 60K as "durable" as a Toyota or even a Suzuki product having a timing chain that needs no replacement? Or would one be considered "high maintenance" while the other is "low maintenance"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the previous generation 1ZZ-FE (98-02) had oil consumption problems. I believe the current generation ones are ok. Toyota was using the 4A engine in the corolla for 15 years or so and they retired it in 97 and put an all new engine in the 98. Since the 1ZZ-FE engine was totally new, I suspect they were working through some issues in the first generation.

 

sv11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess durability, to an extent, is based on a definition that all must agree upon. For instance, is a Mazda or Honda that requires a timing belt replacement every 60K as "durable" as a Toyota or even a Suzuki product having a timing chain that needs no replacement? Or would one be considered "high maintenance" while the other is "low maintenance"?

That's not what I'm talking about.

 

Durability, for me, is how long a car will last without requiring very expensive repairs. For example, at 150,000 miles, the Corolla will be worth very little. It might not make very good sense to replace the engine at this point if it fails. That's not my idea of "durability".

 

My idea of "durability" is a good balance of low service costs and yet long service life. The timing belt issue was one thing that led me to the Corolla over the Civic.

 

In my estimation, with the way I treat and maintain this car, anything less than 250k will be a disappointment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Toyota-san

I guess durability, to an extent, is based on a definition that all must agree upon.  For instance, is a Mazda or Honda that requires a timing belt replacement every 60K as "durable" as a Toyota or even a Suzuki product having a timing chain that needs no replacement?  Or would one be considered "high maintenance" while the other is "low maintenance"?

That's not what I'm talking about.

 

Durability, for me, is how long a car will last without requiring very expensive repairs. For example, at 150,000 miles, the Corolla will be worth very little. It might not make very good sense to replace the engine at this point if it fails. That's not my idea of "durability".

 

My idea of "durability" is a good balance of low service costs and yet long service life. The timing belt issue was one thing that led me to the Corolla over the Civic.

 

In my estimation, with the way I treat and maintain this car, anything less than 250k will be a disappointment.

that's fine and dandy.

 

However, a coworker was satisfied with his Cavalier and none the less disappointed that he had to replace the transmission at 95K. Now he drives a Saturn, had tons of troubles, and is thinking about getting a Cobalt all because of his experience with his Cavalier. Different expectations!

 

Another co worker had no issue at all in replacing timing belts on his Civic every 60K. She considered her Civic to be durable.

 

In both instances, my peers were perfectly "satisfied" with their rides.

 

Once again, one man's trash is another man's treasure. Its all in how you look at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if it isn't one of toyota's best it will probably still last longer than i'd want to keep it. An imperfect toyota motor is probably still better than any ford/GM/Chrysler motor.

 

Even if it isn't toyotas best reliability effort, at least the motor has extra character and fizz.........it's from the MR2 so it has to be. why go an extra 100k miles if those miles are just going to be boring...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no reason why any carefully driven and well-maintained automobile should not last 300 - 500,000 miles. From 1996 to 2000, I worked a full-time 7-days a week job as an airport shuttle pilot driving a fleet of 3 1996 Plymouth Voyager minivans between Dover, Delaware and the Baltimore and Philadelphia airports. I personally put almost a half-million miles on this fleet, and they held up remarkably well in spite of their poor reputation for durability and my boss' penny-pinching maintenence. Two out of three had transmissions replaced, and one of them had the engine replaced as well. One (the one I drove the most) went the whole way -- over 400,000 miles, on the original engine/tranny with only some electrical problems. Of course, they were getting 99% highway mileage. This experience may not necessary be relevant to a Corolla forum, but gives a good example of what's possible in terms of modern vehicle longevity.

 

I would expect my Corolla to literally last forever considering it's low utilization (less than 13,000 miles per year) and over-maintenence (Mobil 1 and Toyota filter changed every 3K). Sure, stuff like brakes will get worn out and be replaced. But the basic car should be capable of lasting me a good long time. At two years and 27,700 miles, I'm just getting started!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess durability, to an extent, is based on a definition that all must agree upon.  For instance, is a Mazda or Honda that requires a timing belt replacement every 60K as "durable" as a Toyota or even a Suzuki product having a timing chain that needs no replacement?  Or would one be considered "high maintenance" while the other is "low maintenance"?

That's not what I'm talking about.

 

Durability, for me, is how long a car will last without requiring very expensive repairs. For example, at 150,000 miles, the Corolla will be worth very little. It might not make very good sense to replace the engine at this point if it fails. That's not my idea of "durability".

 

My idea of "durability" is a good balance of low service costs and yet long service life. The timing belt issue was one thing that led me to the Corolla over the Civic.

 

In my estimation, with the way I treat and maintain this car, anything less than 250k will be a disappointment.

that's fine and dandy.

 

However, a coworker was satisfied with his Cavalier and none the less disappointed that he had to replace the transmission at 95K. Now he drives a Saturn, had tons of troubles, and is thinking about getting a Cobalt all because of his experience with his Cavalier. Different expectations!

 

Another co worker had no issue at all in replacing timing belts on his Civic every 60K. She considered her Civic to be durable.

 

In both instances, my peers were perfectly "satisfied" with their rides.

 

Once again, one man's trash is another man's treasure. Its all in how you look at it.

I would not be satisfied with the Cavalier or the Saturn you mentioned . . and I don't believe I suggested that.

 

I was just asking a simple question: how long should we expect the 1zzfe engine to last?

 

What's so hard about that? Other folks didn't seem to have trouble giving direct answers. I think I see your point, but it's not relevant to the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm more worried about the car lasting instead rather than the engine. At 3 years my car is a rattle box and that stupid radio gap is now huge. Bumper to Bumper warranty is up and for the 4th time the passenger side weatherstipping is falling off. Nice. I can see myself selling this car before the engine dies from old age....which is too bad as I do like the balance of power and fuel economy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Toyota-san
would not be satisfied with the Cavalier or the Saturn you mentioned . . and I don't believe I suggested that.

 

I was just asking a simple question: how long should we expect the 1zzfe engine to last?

 

What's so hard about that? Other folks didn't seem to have trouble giving direct answers. I think I see your point, but it's not relevant to the question.

 

Again, how long is a piece of string?

 

 

:blink:

 

:unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
would not be satisfied with the Cavalier or the Saturn you mentioned . . and I don't believe I suggested that.

 

I was just asking a simple question: how long should we expect the 1zzfe engine to last?

 

What's so hard about that? Other folks didn't seem to have trouble giving direct answers. I think I see your point, but it's not relevant to the question.

 

Again, how long is a piece of string?

 

 

:blink:

 

:unsure:

Sounds like something an Fiat salesman would say if asked the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



×
×
  • Create New...